According to @stocktalkweekly, ENS (ENS) has been “pretty good for a month,” indicating positive 30-day performance and near-term momentum from the author’s perspective. Source: @stocktalkweekly on X, Nov 11, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the address 0x2Cd...5c422, described as a purported early ENS investor, received 163,000 ENS worth approximately 2.35 million dollars from the ENS multisig about 12 minutes prior, bringing total receipts since September 30 to about 11.12 million dollars in ENS with no transfers or sales recorded yet. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x2Cd5BB500066B913d320Fc9AC52a72422915c422 According to @ai_9684xtpa, this address has historically deposited ENS to Binance after receiving allocations, with the most recent deposit occurring six months ago. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x2Cd5BB500066B913d320Fc9AC52a72422915c422

According to @boldleonidas, the ENS name 'boldleonidas.eth' was purchased for over $2,000 and he stated he does not own it, warning followers in case of a potential scam attempt, source: @boldleonidas on X (Aug 18, 2025). This scenario highlights impersonation risk in the ENS market where control of a name can be misused to solicit funds or communications, source: Ethereum Name Service documentation. Traders should verify name ownership, linked addresses, and signed messages via the official ENS app or on-chain records before any transfers or OTC dealings involving ENS names or the ENS token, source: Ethereum Name Service documentation and Ethereum.org security guidelines. ENS names are transferable NFTs on Ethereum, meaning ownership confirms control of the name but not the identity behind it, source: Ethereum Name Service documentation.

According to @boldleonidas, the ENS name boldleonidas.eth was purchased for over $2,000, but the seller clarifies the domain is not owned by him, flagging an impersonation scam risk for traders. Source: @boldleonidas. Traders should verify on-chain ownership and signatures before engaging with messages, OTC offers, or NFT transfers tied to this ENS to prevent phishing and fraud. Source: @boldleonidas. No additional details on buyer identity or marketplace were provided. Source: @boldleonidas.

According to @jessepollak on Twitter, users can now follow an easy, streamlined process to renew their basename on the Ethereum Name Service, as detailed in the shared link (source: @jessepollak, Twitter, June 6, 2025). This upgrade is expected to enhance user experience and reduce friction in managing ENS identities, which may increase on-chain activity and drive up demand for ENS tokens. Traders should monitor ENS-related trading pairs as improved renewal flow could boost transaction volumes and spark renewed interest in ENS-driven DeFi and NFT projects (source: @jessepollak, Twitter, June 6, 2025).

According to Ai 姨 (@ai_9684xtpa), a new wallet address (0x876...03D3E) withdrew 123,000 ENS tokens, valued at $2.82 million, from Bithumb within the last hour. This marks one of the largest on-chain ENS transactions recently. ENS has surged 4.89% in the past 24 hours to $22.92 (source: Twitter, @ai_9684xtpa). The significant movement of ENS tokens may indicate increased whale activity and could impact short-term liquidity and trading volumes on major exchanges. Traders should monitor ENS for potential volatility and liquidity shifts, as large transfers often precede increased market activity.